Approach and Methodology
Synergy’s team of researchers and data modelers worked to collate available information using a combination of open source information and restricted data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Our modelling team established a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to rank and evaluate decisions. This approach effectively combined qualitative analysis of risk-based decision criteria with quantitative drivers produced through data. The criteria helped derive ranking to enable the model’s prioritisation of controls.
Key Criteria Covered
- Quantitative and qualitative data analysis
- Open-source research and information synthesis
- Identification of opportunities and vulnerabilities
- Comparative and gap analyses
- Data modelling and visualisation
- Stakeholder Engagement
Outcomes and Value Delivered
Synergy’s multidisciplinary team embedded within the National Civil Preparedness Branch accomplished a range of significant milestones including:
- The identification of national complex and system risks in concurrent emergencies or crises in the National Civil Preparedness Risk Profile.
- A prioritisation model for government controls (investments, programs, policies) to address the largest portion of national aggregate risk through an automated data model.
- National risks were supported with quantitative data and evidence to inform whole-of-government briefings and decision-making.
- Uplifting the Australian Public Service team capability to engage with complex and systemic risks to analyse distinctions between cascading, compounding and systemic riks. This was also achieved through whole-of-government working groups at the EL2 level that leverage available SME expertise.
- Developing an assurance approach for national resilience as an enduring function within PM&C’s National Civil Preparedness Branch.
- An enduring quantitative model for the prioritization of government controls to drive investments and decision making.