Performance & Governance

Build a healthy enterprise performance and governance culture, deliver outcomes and improve transparency and trust.

Shape Your Agency's Future

Strong performance and governance practices drive value for organisations. It helps secure outcomes and improve transparency and trust. This is especially important for public sector agencies that are subject to intense public and political scrutiny, often have multiple stakeholders, and are under increasing pressure to meet growing citizen expectations. 

Our experience has shown that robust enterprise performance practices are the cornerstone to delivering outcomes for the Commonwealth. A robust approach means you deliver better outcomes for government, clearly articulate the unique value of your agency and drive the right behaviours. We support agencies to design and implement enterprise performance and governance practices to build a healthy performance culture.

Join the webinar

Building a Healthy Performance Culture

How leaders can build a healthy performance culture to deliver greater agency impact. Four things you will discover by joining the webinar:

Performance Frameworks How to build a mature enterprise performance framework so that your agency is ready for ongoing ANAO performance statement audits

Transparent Culture How to foster an open and transparent culture so risks and resources are effectively allocated and managed

Corporate Plan How to ensure your agency’s corporate plan becomes the nexus of your performance culture

Reporting Impact How to use both data and evaluation activity to help monitor, review and report your agency’s impact to external stakeholders

Register Now

Meet the team

Leaders in Enterprise Performance & Governance

How we think

Case Study

National Resilience and Preparedness Risk and Prioritisation Program

Synergy was engaged by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PMC) to deliver a National Civil Preparedness Risk Profile and Prioritisation Assessment Methodology Model to inform a risk-based approach to National Resilience decision making and reporting.
Our team developed a National Civil Preparedness Risk Profile which extensively explored research on 20 primary risks to the civil sector from a major or concurrent national crises and related disruptions.
Fuel security was a key risk identified, and research efforts were focused on highlighting vulnerabilities, in governance, policies, infrastructure and supply chains including contingency plans for emergency fuel distribution. Existing controls to manage fuel risks were derived from open-source research that included government policies and the role of the private sector to inform recommendations for further controls where gaps were identified (e.g. stockpiling and reserves, diversification of supply sources, rationing, and the coordination with states and territories. These controls were prioritization by the data model.
Read More
Case Study

Defence Mobilisation Planning and Analysis

Synergy was engaged by Defence’s Vice Chief of the Defence Force Group to provide expert, independent advice for the development of the Defence Strategic Mobilisation Plan (DSMP). To support this, Synergy developed and delivered an ‘Analysis of the Mobilisation Environment’. This body of research sought to collate quantitative and qualitative evidence to explore the capability and capacity of key national Industries ( private and public), Infrastructure, Critical Material, Workforce, Industry, Science and Technology, Legal Frameworks, and Defence assets to the continuity of the Australian economy during times of strategic regional competition or crisis. These findings from the analysis and research into the broad scope of factors informed the development of the Defence strategic mobilisation plan. The plan was able to address identified vulnerabilities and gaps in national regulatory frameworks, public policies, governance arrangements, investments proirities and broad approaches to national resilience.
Read More
Insight

Mobilisation in the 21st Century: More than Arithmetic

When then-Prime Minister John Curtin declared “total mobilisation” in 1942, he was starting from a position of relative strength. Rapid industrialisation at the beginning on the 20th century had enabled Australia to mobilise its national support base previously during the First World War. It also had the questionable advantage of being at war since 1939, with enemy troops literally at the front door. In 2023 the question of mobilisation is a fundamentally different equation. The Government can’t count on the same social, political, and economic levers that it once did: the tap marked ‘national support base’ won’t work if it doesn’t own the tap anymore, nor control what comes out.
Read More